On Aug 23, 8:04 pm, Aaron Boodman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:34 AM, > > sebastian.zim<[email protected]> wrote: > > Extensions with precompiled scripts in them has advantages other than > > load time. It would allow developers to hide the source code from > > users, which could be important in an extension which encrypts > > passwords, for instance. Anyway, I think that it would make a > > noticeable difference to the time it takes chrome to load. > > If we did this, it would work like a cache -- you would still send > source, we would compile it the first time and cache that > transparently. >
Why, couldn't we just find a code that could be easily transformed into the machine code of whatever platform that version of chrome is running on. It is vital that we find a way to hide the source of extensions (I have already given you an example) from malicious users. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
