Hello Andrew,
  Thanks for your question. Someone on my team will be contacting you soon to 
assist with this matter.

Thanks
John Dunning
Senior Escalation Engineer Microsoft Corporation US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
Email: [email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 10:11 PM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Andrew Tridgell
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text 
files SRX090109601490

On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 09:07 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote:
> Andrew:
> 
> Attached are schema files for Windows 2008 and Windows 2008R2/Windows 7.  The 
> Windows 2008 schema should not have any issues based upon initial validation 
> against the Windows 2008 schema.  The release notes for the Windows 
> 2008R2/Windows 7 schema are as follows (All issues are under investigation at 
> this time):
> 
> 1. cn: Computer - Schema pulled from Windows 2008R2 shows two additional 
> attributes for systemMayContain msTSSecondaryDesktopBL, msTSPrimaryDesktopBL. 
>  These are not present in the latest documentation for this attribute.
> 2. cn: Domain-DNS - defaultSecurityDescriptor in does not match the schema 
> pulled from Windows 2008R2 3. cn: inetOrgPerson - defaultSecurityDescriptor 
> does not match the schema pulled from Windows 2008R2 4. cn: Object-Class - 
> searchFlags do not match the schema pulled from Windows 2008R2 5. cn: 
> Sam-Domain - defaultSecurityDescriptor does not match the schema pulled from 
> Windows 2008R2 6. cn: Schema - This attribute may be missing from the schema 
> documentation.  It shows up in the Windows 2008R2 schema so it is being 
> investigated. 
> 7. cn: Top - There appears to be a discrepancy with the generated Windows 
> 2008R2 schema and the documented schema for systemMayContain attribute.

Dear Dochelp,

Did anyone ever solve these, and can I get a correct file for the final release 
of Windows 2008 R2?  Do you have a script to validate these?

We are finding far more errors than just the above (diff to follow shortly), as 
it seems these files are still generated by hand (why?!?)

Thanks,

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.

_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol

Reply via email to