On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 22:55 +0000, Hongwei Sun wrote: > Tridge/Andrew, > > We are in the process to update our MS-ADA* documents to reflect all the > changes you made to the schema. I just want to confirm how you got these > changes and if all these changes are essential. Your comments in diff below > mentioned only the typos. > > "The schema from WSPP had a number of typos that prevented it from > working. These changes allow it to work with Samba, and allow w2k8r2 > to run DCPROMO against Samba successfully" > > How about the other changes, especially all these attributes adding > SystemFlags: 0 ? If you don't have these changes, does it affect the > functionality of W2k8 R2 to join Samba domain ? Have you got the > other changes by comparing with an existing W2k8R2 schema ? The > following is the list of attributes that affect schema documents.
We didn't do this as a 'does this make things break', but as 'what is required to make the schema come out identical again'. We don't trust that we can write tests that can prove that a different schema is equivalent for all client software, so instead we go for exact value comparison. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
