cifs-protocol  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] What elements of the DIT are required for AD to operate? tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] What elements of the DIT are required for AD to operate? Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] SMBv1 multiple lock cancel behavior Steven Danneman
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMBv1 multiple lock cancel behavior Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMBv1 multiple lock cancel behavior Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] primaryGroupToken Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] primaryGroupToken Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] primaryGroupToken Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] primaryGroupToken Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] SMB2 mixed lock & unlock requests in a single SMB_LOCK request Steven Danneman
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB2 mixed lock & unlock requests in a single SMB_LOCK request Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB2 mixed lock & unlock requests in a single SMB_LOCK request Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB2 mixed lock & unlock requests in a single SMB_LOCK request Steven Danneman
• [cifs-protocol] SMBv1 LockAndX return status on lock conflict Steven Danneman
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMBv1 LockAndX return status on lock conflict Tom Jebo
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMBv1 LockAndX return status on lock conflict Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMBv1 LockAndX return status on lock conflict Steven Danneman
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMBv1 LockAndX return status on lock conflict Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMBv1 LockAndX return status on lock conflict Steven Danneman
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMBv1 LockAndX return status on lock conflict Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Tim Prouty
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Tom Jebo
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Tim Prouty
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Tim Prouty
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Tim Prouty
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Tim Prouty
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Tim Prouty
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Tim Prouty
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Zachary Loafman
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Tim Prouty
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Tim Prouty
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Tim Prouty
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] New case: SRX091209600095 Trans2SetPathInfo() returns truncated SMB header Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] New case: SRX091209600095 Trans2SetPathInfo() returns truncated SMB header Tim Prouty
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] New case: SRX091209600095 Trans2SetPathInfo() returns truncated SMB header Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] New case: SRX091209600095 Trans2SetPathInfo() returns truncated SMB header Tim Prouty
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] New case: SRX091209600095 Trans2SetPathInfo() returns truncated SMB header Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091209600095 Trans2SetPathInfo() returns truncated SMB header Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091209600095 Trans2SetPathInfo() returns truncated SMB header Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091209600095 Trans2SetPathInfo() returns truncated SMB header Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Jeremy Allison
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not enforcing share modes Bill Wesse
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR: DS_FLAG Option bits (SRX091002600036 [MS-ADTS] 7.3.3.2 DS_FLAG option bits) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR: DS_FLAG Option bits (SRX091002600036 [MS-ADTS] 7.3.3.2 DS_FLAG option bits) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR: DS_FLAG Option bits (SRX091002600036 [MS-ADTS] 7.3.3.2 DS_FLAG option bits) Bill Wesse
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control (SRX091119600169) Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control (SRX091119600169) Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control (SRX091119600169) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control (SRX091119600169) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control (SRX091119600169) Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control (SRX091119600169) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control (SRX091119600169) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control (SRX091119600169) Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control (SRX091119600169) Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091201600038 [MS-ADTS] LDAPControl not applied on add Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] Object(OR-Name) syntax implementation Kamen Mazdrashki
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Object(OR-Name) syntax implementation John Dunning
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Object(OR-Name) syntax implementation Dominic Salemno
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Object(OR-Name) syntax implementation John Dunning
• [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control Dominic Salemno
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control (SRX091119600169) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Need some help with LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control (SRX091119600169) Bill Wesse
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about self relative form of SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR (SRX091118600013) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about self relative form of SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR (SRX091118600013) Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about self relative form of SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR (SRX091118600013) Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] FW: Question about self relative form of SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR (SRX091118600013) Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] Fwd: Question about self relative form of SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR Nadezhda Ivanova
• [cifs-protocol] Status: limits on rDN size in AD (SRX091112600056 [MS-ADTS] limits on rDN size in AD) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: limits on rDN size in AD (SRX091112600056 [MS-ADTS] limits on rDN size in AD) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: limits on rDN size in AD (SRX091112600056 [MS-ADTS] limits on rDN size in AD) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: limits on rDN size in AD (SRX091112600056 [MS-ADTS] limits on rDN size in AD) Bill Wesse
• Re: [cifs-protocol] limits on rDN size in AD (SRX091112600056 [MS-ADTS] limits on rDN size in AD) Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] How to get the expanded group memberships for a user Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to get the expanded group memberships for a user Tom Jebo
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to get the expanded group memberships for a user Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to get the expanded group memberships for a user Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to get the expanded group memberships for a user Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to get the expanded group memberships for a user Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Tom Jebo
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Kamen Mazdrashki
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] FW: Group Policy questions Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: Group Policy questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: Group Policy questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: Group Policy questions Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: Group Policy questions Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: Group Policy questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: Group Policy questions Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: Group Policy questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: Group Policy questions Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: Group Policy questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: Group Policy questions Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: Group Policy questions Matthieu Patou
• Re: [cifs-protocol] DRS option bits Kamen Mazdrashki
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] DRS option bits Hongwei Sun
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about [MS-DRSR] section 5.12.2 - prefixMap implementation Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about [MS-DRSR] section 5.12.2 - prefixMap implementation Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about [MS-DRSR] section 5.12.2 - prefixMap implementation Kamen Mazdrashki
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about [MS-DRSR] section 5.12.2 - prefixMap implementation Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about [MS-DRSR] section 5.12.2 - prefixMap implementation Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about [MS-DRSR] section 5.12.2 - prefixMap implementation Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about [MS-DRSR] section 5.12.2 - prefixMap implementation Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about [MS-DRSR] section 5.12.2 - prefixMap implementation Kamen Mazdrashki
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about [MS-DRSR] section 5.12.2 - prefixMap implementation Kamen Mazdrashki
• [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] CAR: limits on rDN size in AD ? tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] limits on rDN size in AD ? Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] limits on rDN size in AD ? Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] limits on rDN size in AD ? tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] limits on rDN size in AD ? Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] CAR: DRS option bits tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] DRS option bits Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] DRS option bits Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] DRS option bits Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] DRS option bits Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] DRS option bits tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] DRS option bits Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] Group Policy questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Group Policy questions (SRX091011600003 [MS-GPSB] Group Policy AD ACL to File ACL) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Group Policy questions Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Group Policy questions Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Group Policy questions Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Group Policy questions Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] CAR: DS_FLAG Option bits tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] DS_FLAG Option bits Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] DS_FLAG Option bits (SRX091002600036 "[MS-ADTS] 7.3.3.2 DS_FLAG option bits") Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] SRX090922600157 : [MS-ADTS] 7.1.1.1 Naming Contexts Domain Admins Permissions Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SRX090922600157 : [MS-ADTS] 7.1.1.1 Naming Contexts Domain Admins Permissions Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SRX090922600157 : [MS-ADTS] 7.1.1.1 Naming Contexts Domain Admins Permissions Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SRX090922600157 : [MS-ADTS] 7.1.1.1 Naming Contexts Domain Admins Permissions Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SRX090922600157 : [MS-ADTS] 7.1.1.1 Naming Contexts Domain Admins Permissions Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SRX090922600157 : [MS-ADTS] 7.1.1.1 Naming Contexts Domain Admins Permissions Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SRX090922600157 : [MS-ADTS] 7.1.1.1 Naming Contexts Domain Admins Permissions Nadezhda Ivanova
• [cifs-protocol] salt used for various principal types Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] salt used for various principal types Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] salt used for various principal types Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] salt used for various principal types Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] salt used for various principal types Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] salt used for various principal types Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] salt used for various principal types Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] repsFromTo blob format (WSPP CAR) tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] repsFromTo blob format (WSPP CAR) Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] repsFromTo blob format (WSPP CAR) Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] repsFromTo blob format (WSPP CAR) Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] Bitfields in the WSPP docs Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Bitfields in the WSPP docs Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] cifs/ SPN not accepted in certain scenarios Zachary Loafman
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs/ SPN not accepted in certain scenarios Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs/ SPN not accepted in certain scenarios Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs/ SPN not accepted in certain scenarios Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun

• Earlier messages
• Later messages