cifs-protocol  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS Nadezhda Ivanova
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX090805600011 : [MS-ADTS] 5.1.3.2.1 Control Access Rights Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX090805600011 : [MS-ADTS] 5.1.3.2.1 Control Access Rights Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX090805600011 : [MS-ADTS] 5.1.3.2.1 Control Access Rights Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX090805600011 : [MS-ADTS] 5.1.3.2.1 Control Access Rights Bill Wesse
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Jeremy Allison
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Jeremy Allison
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Jeremy Allison
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Jeremy Allison
• [cifs-protocol] More information needed about Control Access Rights im MS-ADTS Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] More information needed about Control Access Rights im MS-ADTS Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] SRX090805600011 : [MS-ADTS] 5.1.3.2.1 Control Access Rights Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX090805600011 : [MS-ADTS] 5.1.3.2.1 Control Access Rights Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS Obaid Farooqi
• Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] Status of [MS-RAIW]? Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status of [MS-RAIW]? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status of [MS-RAIW]? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status of [MS-RAIW]? Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status of [MS-RAIW]? Sebastian Canevari
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] Inability to use Win2k8 as a member server in Samba4 domain (was Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Inability to use Win2k8 as a member server in Samba4 domain (was Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response) Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Inability to use Win2k8 as a member server in Samba4 domain (was Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Inability to use Win2k8 as a member server in Samba4 domain (was Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response) Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Inability to use Win2k8 as a member server in Samba4 domain (was Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response) Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Dominic Salemno
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] How does constrained delegation work? Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How does constrained delegation work? Dominic Salemno
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How does constrained delegation work? Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How does constrained delegation work? Andrew Bartlett
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-ADTS] servicePrincipalName nTSecurityDescriptor (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-ADTS] servicePrincipalName nTSecurityDescriptor (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-ADTS] servicePrincipalName nTSecurityDescriptor (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-ADTS] servicePrincipalName nTSecurityDescriptor (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-ADTS] servicePrincipalName nTSecurityDescriptor (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-ADTS] servicePrincipalName nTSecurityDescriptor (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-ADTS] servicePrincipalName nTSecurityDescriptor (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 Edgar Olougouna
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 Edgar Olougouna
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Re: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 Neil B Martin (MountD)
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Re: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers tridge
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - ldap display specifiers Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers tridge
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - ldap display specifiers Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. Jeremy Allison
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. Jeremy Allison
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. Jeremy Allison
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. (SRX090604600250) Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] [MS-SMB2] Error in SMB2 Netprot description. SRX090604600250, SRX090604600324, SRX090604600333 Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] CAR: how are unique attributes determined? tridge
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: how are unique attributes determined? Tom Jebo
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: how are unique attributes determined? Edgar Olougouna
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: how are unique attributes determined? Edgar Olougouna
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: how are unique attributes determined? tridge
• [cifs-protocol] Can an AD server have more than one domain? Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Can an AD server have more than one domain? Sebastian Canevari
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Can an AD server have more than one domain? Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian Steve French
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian Steve French
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian Steve French
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian (SRX090617600092) Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian (SRX090617600092) Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Resend: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian (SRX090617600092) Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] SMBTorture tests Long Li
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMBTorture tests Jeremy Allison
• [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Obaid Farooqi
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian [MS-ADTS]: SRX090529600007 Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Richard Guthrie

• Earlier messages
• Later messages