cifs-protocol  

Messages by Thread

• [cifs-protocol] MS-DFSC potential incoherent documentation Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 210041353965669001 ]RE: MS-RPRN: Question on PRINTER_INFO_STRESS.cAddNetPrinters Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 210041353965669001 ]RE: MS-RPRN: Question on PRINTER_INFO_STRESS.cAddNetPrinters Andreas Schneider
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 210041353965669001 ]RE: MS-RPRN: Question on PRINTER_INFO_STRESS.cAddNetPrinters Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 210041353965669001 ]RE: MS-RPRN: Question on PRINTER_INFO_STRESS.cAddNetPrinters Andreas Schneider
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110041557300829] RE: Questions regarding 7.1.3.1 ACE Ordering Rules Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110041557300829] RE: Questions regarding 7.1.3.1 ACE Ordering Rules Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110041557300829] RE: Questions regarding 7.1.3.1 ACE Ordering Rules Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110041557300829] RE: Questions regarding 7.1.3.1 ACE Ordering Rules Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] Questions regarding 7.1.3.1 ACE Ordering Rules Nadezhda Ivanova
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:110041557300829] RE: Questions regarding 7.1.3.1 ACE Ordering Rules Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:110041557300829] RE: Questions regarding 7.1.3.1 ACE Ordering Rules Hongwei Sun
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110021555999716] [REG: 110021555999716 ] Spoolss questions Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110021555999716] [REG: 110021555999716 ] Spoolss questions Matthieu Patou
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 210041353965669001 ]MS-RPRN: Question on PRINTER_INFO_STRESS.cAddNetPrinters Obaid Farooqi
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110040646791367] : RE: Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110040646791367] : RE: Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER Luke Howard
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110040646791367] : RE: Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110040646791367] : RE: Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER Nadezhda Ivanova
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:110040646791367] : RE: Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER Hongwei Sun
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 210031349737651001 ] MS-KILE and ad-type 142 ? Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 210031349737651001 ] MS-KILE and ad-type 142 ? simo
• [cifs-protocol] technical info.. arnab tah
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:210031349737651001] [MS-KILE] and ad-type 142 Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] CAR: MS-KILE and ad-type 142 ? simo
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR: MS-KILE and ad-type 142 ? Luke Howard
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-KILE and ad-type 142 ? Mark Miller (MBD)
• [cifs-protocol] LsaLogonUser and s4u2self Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] LsaLogonUser and s4u2self Mark Miller (MBD)
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110030871487040] LsaLogonUser and s4u2self Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110030871487040] LsaLogonUser and s4u2self Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] LsaLogonUser and s4u2self Luke Howard
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] LsaLogonUser and s4u2self Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] LsaLogonUser and s4u2self Luke Howard
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ]Spoolss questions Obaid Farooqi
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] Spoolss questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] Spoolss questions Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] Spoolss questions Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] Spoolss questions Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] Remote Administration Protocol protocol (RAP / Lanman) over SMB2 Daniel Ng
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011276087815] [MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.3.11 NETLOGON_DOMAIN_INFO SupportedEncTypes John Dunning
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011276087815] [MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.3.11 NETLOGON_DOMAIN_INFO SupportedEncTypes John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011276087815] [MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.3.11 NETLOGON_DOMAIN_INFO SupportedEncTypes John Dunning
• [cifs-protocol] Large files Samba 3.0.10 on Solaris 9 GCurtis
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] RE: Spoolss questions Obaid Farooqi
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] RE: Spoolss questions Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] RE: Spoolss questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] RE: Spoolss questions Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] RE: Spoolss questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] RE: Spoolss questions Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] Spoolss questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Spoolss questions Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] question on DNS TSIG dynamic updates tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] question on DNS TSIG dynamic updates tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] question on DNS TSIG dynamic updates Edgar Olougouna
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:110021555585893] RE: question on DNS TSIG dynamic updates John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:110021555585893] RE: question on DNS TSIG dynamic updates tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110021555585893] RE: question on DNS TSIG dynamic updates John Dunning
• [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] CAR: Bad variable names in MS-RPRN : 3.1.4.1.2 Dynamically Typed Query Parameters Jeremy Allison
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] CAR: Bad variable names in MS-RPRN : 3.1.4.1.2 Dynamically Typed Query Parameters Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020359682290] [MS-RPRN] 3.1.4.1.2 Dynamically Typed Query Parameters - Bad variable names David Wooden
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020359682290] [MS-RPRN] 3.1.4.1.2 Dynamically Typed Query Parameters - Bad variable names David Wooden
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020359682290] [MS-RPRN] 3.1.4.1.2 Dynamically Typed Query Parameters - Bad variable names Jeremy Allison
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020359682290] [MS-RPRN] 3.1.4.1.2 Dynamically Typed Query Parameters - Bad variable names David Wooden
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Bug in MS-WINSRA section "2.2.10.1 Name Record" Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Bug in MS-WINSRA section "2.2.10.1 Name Record" Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:110012953632586] RE: Bug in MS-WINSRA section "2.2.10.1 Name Record" Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Bug in MS-WINSRA section "2.2.10.1 Name Record" Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Bug in MS-WINSRA section "2.2.10.1 Name Record" Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Bug in MS-WINSRA section "2.2.10.1 Name Record" Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Bug in MS-WINSRA section "2.2.10.1 Name Record" Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Bug in MS-WINSRA section "2.2.10.1 Name Record" Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Bug in MS-WINSRA section "2.2.10.1 Name Record" Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Bug in MS-WINSRA section "2.2.10.1 Name Record" Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:110012953632586] [MS-WINSRA] 2.2.10.1 Name Record Padding field description incorrect Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX100106600091 [MS-ADTS]: RID manage behavior Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX100106600091 [MS-ADTS]: RID manage behavior Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX100106600091 [MS-ADTS]: RID manage behavior Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX100106600091 [MS-ADTS]: RID manage behavior Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX100106600091 [MS-ADTS]: RID manage behavior Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091112600382 [MS-GPOL] - OI and CI flags on every ACL entries Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091112600382 [MS-GPOL] - OI and CI flags on every ACL entries Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091112600382 [MS-GPOL] - OI and CI flags on every ACL entries Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091112600382 [MS-GPOL] - OI and CI flags on every ACL entries Sebastian Canevari
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencies in ACLs Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencies in ACLs Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencies in ACLs Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencies in ACLs Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencies in ACLs Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencies in ACLs Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencies in ACLs Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencies in ACLs Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencies in ACLs Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091111600231 [MS-ADA3]: 2.115 Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091111600231 [MS-ADA3]: 2.115 Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091111600231 [MS-ADA3]: 2.115 Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Kamen Mazdrashki
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091111600231 [MS-ADA3]: 2.115 Structure of prefixMap over LDAP Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] repadmin.exe crashing - TTT trace tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] repadmin.exe crashing - TTT trace Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] repadmin.exe crashing - TTT trace tridge
• [cifs-protocol] CAR: userParameters attribute tridge
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] Intial Response: RE: userParameters attribute Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute Hongwei Sun
• Re: [cifs-protocol] CIFS at connectathon 2010, Feb. 22-25 in Santa Clara CA Jeremy Allison
• [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091216600027 [MS-ADTS] 3.1.1.2.3 msDS-IntId not always present Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091216600027 [MS-ADTS] 3.1.1.2.3 msDS-IntId not always present Kamen Mazdrashki
• [cifs-protocol] STATUS_OS2_INVALID_LEVEL Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] STATUS_OS2_INVALID_LEVEL Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] STATUS_OS2_INVALID_LEVEL Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] STATUS_OS2_INVALID_LEVEL Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091209600095 [MS-SMB] error returns Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091209600095 [MS-SMB] error returns Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011157366122] Initial Response Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] DPAPI interaction with Active Directory Matthieu Patou
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:210011157366122001] [MS-ADTS] PFIF DPAPI interaction with Active Directory Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:210011157366122001] [MS-ADTS] PFIF DPAPI interaction with Active Directory Matthieu Patou
• Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 John Dunning
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] How do we know what attributes are OIDs, classes and attributes Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How do we know what attributes are OIDs, classes and attributes John Dunning
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How do we know what attributes are OIDs, classes and attributes Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] How do we know what attributes are OIDs, classes and attributes Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] Concurrent users connection for CIFS Server [email protected]
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Concurrent users connection for CIFS Server tridge
• [cifs-protocol] RID Allocation behaviour Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] RID Allocation behaviour Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] RID Allocation behaviour John Dunning
• [cifs-protocol] of SupportedEncTypes and msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] of SupportedEncTypes and msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes Tom Jebo
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] of SupportedEncTypes and msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] of SupportedEncTypes and msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] of SupportedEncTypes and msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091220600031 [MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.7.3 msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091220600031 [MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.7.3 msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091220600031 [MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.7.3 msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091220600031 [MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.7.3 msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091220600031 [MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.7.3 msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091220600031 [MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.7.3 msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091220600031 [MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.7.3 msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091220600031 [MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.7.3 msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control and search request Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control and search request Tom Jebo
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control and search request Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control and search request Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control and search request Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control and search request Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] LDAP_SERVER_SD_FLAGS_OID control and search request Matthieu Patou
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091201600038 [MS-ADTS] LDAPControl not applied on add Nadezhda Ivanova
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091201600038 [MS-ADTS] LDAPControl not applied on add Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] OPEN_ANDX undocumented flag with 19 word count response Zachary Loafman
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] OPEN_ANDX undocumented flag with 19 word count response Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] OPEN_ANDX undocumented flag with 19 word count response Zachary Loafman
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] OPEN_ANDX undocumented flag with 19 word count response Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] SRX091217600064 [MS-CIFS] OPEN_ANDX undocumented flag with 19 word count Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] Regarding DCERPC naveen kumar
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Regarding DCERPC ronnie sahlberg
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Regarding DCERPC ronnie sahlberg
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Regarding DCERPC Neil B Martin
• [cifs-protocol] Conflicting OIDs Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Conflicting OIDs Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Conflicting OIDs Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Conflicting OIDs Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Conflicting OIDs Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] What elements of the DIT are required for AD to operate? Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] What elements of the DIT are required for AD to operate? (SRX091208600025) Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] What elements of the DIT are required for AD to operate? Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] What elements of the DIT are required for AD to operate? Hongwei Sun

• Earlier messages
• Later messages