it is questionable if they provide the same level of functionality... if you can do the research, you are welcomed ...
bye andraz On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 15:57 -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > I'm wondering, it seems that the internal quicktime code is quite a > bit older than the external libquicktime project. Is there a reason > why cinelerra is maintaining an internal quicktime codebase (still)? > I realize cinelerra originally created the codebase, but wouldn't it > be better to change to using the external library now? > > My point is, I can create a patch to use the external quicktime, > unless there is some reason not to. > > _______________________________________________ > Cinelerra mailing list > [email protected] > https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
