> You'll often see that problem when there are non-Cisco layer 2 devices 
> between the neighbors.
> 
> Some non-Cisco gear relays CDP frames out all interfaces which results 
> in CDP reporting direct connections which in reality are not.  The only 
> workaround of which I am aware is to disable CDP on those interfaces or 
> ignore the error reports.

Hi,

        I'm not sure I explained myself correctly......(And I don't
understand what your trying to accomplish above)

        The setup looks like this :

TRANSIT1                  TRANSIT2
   |                         |
   |-E0/0                    |-E1/0
   |                         |
-------------------------------------
              3640
-------------------------------------
   |                         |
   |-E0/1                    |-E1/1
   |--------BVI1-------------|
   |                         |
   |-FA0/24                  |-FA0/24
----------                ------------
2924-1                      2924-2
---------                 ------------
  |-FA0/15
  |
  |-Netgear Ethernet Over Power Extender

        So its complaining that FA0/15 on 2924-1 is mismatched
to E0/0 on the 3640. Well, DUH, no fooling. I would think 
the only things it cares about are 3640~E0/1&2924-1~FA0/24
and 3640~E1/1&2924-2~FA0/24 since those are the only 2 places
that the Ciscos directly connect. 

        For those that wanted more info, E0/0 is connected
to a Proxim Wireless Broadband antenna at 10/half, E1/0
connected to a Hughes Satellite Modem at 10/half, E0/1 and
E1/1 are bridged (BVI1) and connected to the 2924's at
10/half. The Netgear is connected to 2924-1 at 100/full.

        The 2924's and 3640 are only Cisco equipment at the
site.

                Tuc


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to