Are both models the WS-C3560G-48TS-S version? The first device you mentioned, is it running layer 2 only, into the L2 access switchport and then out to the L2 trunk?
________________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Kent [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 10:31 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [c-nsp] cisco 3560 layer3 performance Hello, I've got a cisco 3560 (WS-C3560G-48TS-S) pulling in (80Mbs, 6500pps) on one switch port, and sending it out a trunk... cpu load is 5%. Another cisco 3560, pulling in that same traffic on a trunk and sending it out a layer3 point-to-point gigE is running at 70 to 80% (cpu hog is "IP Input"). In fact, the cpu load is roughly the same as the Mbs load. 50Mbs = 50%. Now, I know it's a small switch in the cisco line. But wouldn't we expect it to do a fair bit better than this? It looks like it will crap out at 100Mbs of layer3 traffic. Thanks, -mark _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Note: This message and any attachments is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, legally privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the original sender immediately by telephone or return email and destroy or delete this message along with any attachments immediately. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
