static routes are not supposed to be dynamic and bfd is not designed for static routes.
dave ----- Original Message ---- From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Justin Shore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2008 7:47:08 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BFD for static routes This has happened to me twice and the answers i got from Cisco were : 1) the feature wasn't supposed to work from the beginning 2) the feature was causing conflict with other, more important features Although our account team was involved, although cisco developers were involved...nothing happened. -- Tassos Justin Shore wrote on 18/1/2008 4:57 πμ: > Arie, > > Not to nit-pick here but it's not a bug. It was a feature. The feature > worked perfectly fine. Then support for the working feature was > removed. Intentionally taking away a feature isn't a bug in my opinion. > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address. www.yahoo7.com.au/y7mail _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
