Hi, On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:20:18PM -0800, snort bsd wrote: > static routes are not supposed to be dynamic and bfd is not designed for > static routes.
Thanks for this incredibly helpful comment.
Please read up in the mailing list archives about real-world networks
and why bfd for static would help a lot in certain environments.
There is nothing in the design of BFD that has serious problems with
using it for static - consider "static route" just another routing protocol
that can be signalled when a link becomes unavailable. Not very much
different from what happens when the link state goes down -> static routes
are removed.
(But with that l33t user name, you've propably never seen a *real* Router
- on BSD systems, this is certainly not so easily implemented).
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpVNs8l0O1Wu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
