Hi! No. I do not redistribute bgp into igp. I was send my BGP config in previons letter. I do not have any vfr`s configured.. :-(
-- Pavel D.Kuzin Technical Director. Nodex LTD. Saint-Petersburg, Russia [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nodex.ru tel. +7 812 3800033 ext. 311 fax. +7 812 2304573 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pavel Kuzin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 2:37 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SUP 720 3BXL + 2 BGP Full View + MPLS VPN > > Your not redistributing bgp into your igp? Normally the only way the > prefix table in bgp causes a label per prefix is if you place it into > a vrf, or you redistribute bgp into your igp. The normal case is you > only have labels created for routes in your igp. Since you don't have > routes in the vrf, is your bgp tabe somehow ending up in your igp? > > > Ian > > > At 12:58 AM 2/29/2008 +0300, you wrote: >>Hi >> >>BGP currently only in global. No one VRF configured in system. >> >>This is my BGP config: >> >>router bgp XXXXX >> bgp router-id XX.XX.XX.15 >> bgp always-compare-med >> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >> bgp cluster-id XX.XX.XX.0 >> bgp log-neighbor-changes >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 remote-as XXXXX >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 description XXXXX-GW >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 update-source Loopback0 >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 remote-as XXXXX >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 description XXX-GW >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 update-source Loopback0 >> neighbor XX.XX.225.153 remote-as 3216 >> neighbor XX.XX.225.153 description GOLDEN-TELECOM >> neighbor XX.XX.67.33 remote-as 1299 >> neighbor XX.XX.67.33 description TELIA-SONERA >> ! >> address-family ipv4 >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 activate >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 send-community extended >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 route-reflector-client >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 activate >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 send-community both >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 route-reflector-client >> neighbor XX.XX.225.153 activate >> neighbor XX.XX.225.153 next-hop-self >> neighbor XX.XX.225.153 route-map from_golden in >> neighbor XX.XX.225.153 route-map GOLDEN-OUT out >> neighbor XX.XX.67.33 activate >> neighbor XX.XX.67.33 next-hop-self >> neighbor XX.XX.67.33 route-map from_telia in >> neighbor XX.XX.67.33 route-map TELIA-OUT out >> no auto-summary >> no synchronization >> >> exit-address-family >> ! >> address-family vpnv4 >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 activate >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 send-community extended >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 route-reflector-client >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 activate >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 send-community extended >> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 route-reflector-client >> exit-address-family >> >> > >> >> > Are you placing the BGP routes into a VRF rather than the global >> > table? In the global case you will end up with labels just for IGP routes, >> > with the VRF case you will end up with a label per prefix. >> > >> > >> > Ian >> > >> > >> > At 11:35 PM 2/28/2008 +0300, Pavel Kuzin wrote: >> > >> >> Hi! >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for your reply. >> >> >> >> >> >> I have just simple MPLS and BGP config too. >> >> >> >> >> >> #sh run | in mpls >> >> mpls ldp loop-detection mpls label protocol ldp mpls mtu 1540 mpls ip mpls >> >> mtu 1540 mpls ip mpls mtu 1540 mpls ip mpls ldp router-id Loopback0 force >> >> >> >> #sh mpls interfaces >> >> Interface IP Tunnel BGP Static Operational >> >> Vlan100 Yes (ldp) No No No Yes >> >> Vlan410 Yes (ldp) No No No Yes >> >> Vlan301 Yes (ldp) No No No Yes >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> hi pavel, >> >>> >> >>> i must admit, i'm not an mpls guru, but im working on it ;) whilst i >> >>> can't offer you any direct solution, i can say i'm a bit fascinated >> >>> by this because i have for example a sup720 3bxl taking 3 x full views >> >>> 243k >> >>> routes per peer, have mpls tag switching enabled on 5 SVI's and i dont >> >>> see the behaviour you see. >> >>> >> >>> router#sh mpls int | i Vl Vlan2 Yes (ldp) No Yes >> >>> Vlan3 Yes (ldp) No Yes >> >>> Vlan4 Yes (ldp) No Yes >> >>> Vlan12 Yes (ldp) No Yes >> >>> Vlan14 Yes (ldp) No Yes >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> router# sh ip bgp sum Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent >> >>> TblVer >> >>> InQ OutQ Up/Down >> >>> State/PfxRcd >> >>> 61.88.xxx.xx 4 7474 19165667 424902 69092680 0 0 21w2d >> >>> 243009 >> >>> 61.88.xxx.xx 4 7474 20943846 426386 69092680 0 0 5w2d >> >>> 243007 >> >>> 220.157.xx.x 4 9723 12753587 15032863 69092733 0 0 2w0d >> >>> 243093 >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> router#sh platform hardware cap | b L3 Forward L3 Forwarding >> >>> Resources >> >>> FIB TCAM usage: Total Used >> >>> %Used >> >>> 72 bits (IPv4, MPLS, EoM) 524288 246423 >> >>> 47% >> >>> 144 bits (IP mcast, IPv6) 262144 5 >> >>> 1% >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> router#sh mpls ip bind sum Total number of prefixes: 1453 >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Generic label bindings >> >>> assigned learned prefixes in labels out labels 1453 >> >>> 1446 13042 >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> my mpls config is pretty straight forward >> >>> >> >>> mpls label range 16 256000 mpls label protocol ldp no tag-switching >> >>> ip propagate-ttl tag-switching tdp router-id Loopback0 force >> >>> >> >>> ... very curious !! >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> hardware is sup720 pfc3bxl with ios 12.2(18)SXF8 >> >>> >> >>> kind regards, >> >>> >> >>> --matt >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > >> > >> >>_______________________________________________ >>cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
