bbn-ms-gw#debug bgp ipv4 unicast mpls BGP MPLS labels debugging is on 2w0d: BGP: adding MPLS label to 202.52.15.0/24 sending labels not enabled 2w0d: BGP: adding MPLS label to 202.52.12.0/24 sending labels not enabled
Why it added MPLS label to prefix? Noone told it to do that. -- Pavel D.Kuzin Technical Director. Nodex LTD. Saint-Petersburg, Russia [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nodex.ru tel. +7 812 3800033 ext. 311 fax. +7 812 2304573 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pavel Kuzin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 10:59 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SUP 720 3BXL + 2 BGP Full View + MPLS VPN > Hi! > > No. I do not redistribute bgp into igp. > I was send my BGP config in previons letter. > I do not have any vfr`s configured.. :-( > > -- > Pavel D.Kuzin > Technical Director. > Nodex LTD. > Saint-Petersburg, Russia > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://nodex.ru > tel. +7 812 3800033 ext. 311 > fax. +7 812 2304573 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ian Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pavel Kuzin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 2:37 AM > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SUP 720 3BXL + 2 BGP Full View + MPLS VPN > > >> >> Your not redistributing bgp into your igp? Normally the only way the >> prefix table in bgp causes a label per prefix is if you place it into >> a vrf, or you redistribute bgp into your igp. The normal case is you >> only have labels created for routes in your igp. Since you don't have >> routes in the vrf, is your bgp tabe somehow ending up in your igp? >> >> >> Ian >> >> >> At 12:58 AM 2/29/2008 +0300, you wrote: >>>Hi >>> >>>BGP currently only in global. No one VRF configured in system. >>> >>>This is my BGP config: >>> >>>router bgp XXXXX >>> bgp router-id XX.XX.XX.15 >>> bgp always-compare-med >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp cluster-id XX.XX.XX.0 >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 remote-as XXXXX >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 description XXXXX-GW >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 update-source Loopback0 >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 remote-as XXXXX >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 description XXX-GW >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 update-source Loopback0 >>> neighbor XX.XX.225.153 remote-as 3216 >>> neighbor XX.XX.225.153 description GOLDEN-TELECOM >>> neighbor XX.XX.67.33 remote-as 1299 >>> neighbor XX.XX.67.33 description TELIA-SONERA >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 activate >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 send-community extended >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 route-reflector-client >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 activate >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 send-community both >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 route-reflector-client >>> neighbor XX.XX.225.153 activate >>> neighbor XX.XX.225.153 next-hop-self >>> neighbor XX.XX.225.153 route-map from_golden in >>> neighbor XX.XX.225.153 route-map GOLDEN-OUT out >>> neighbor XX.XX.67.33 activate >>> neighbor XX.XX.67.33 next-hop-self >>> neighbor XX.XX.67.33 route-map from_telia in >>> neighbor XX.XX.67.33 route-map TELIA-OUT out >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family vpnv4 >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 activate >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 send-community extended >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.10 route-reflector-client >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 activate >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 send-community extended >>> neighbor XX.XX.XX.14 route-reflector-client >>> exit-address-family >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Are you placing the BGP routes into a VRF rather than the global >>> > table? In the global case you will end up with labels just for IGP routes, >>> > with the VRF case you will end up with a label per prefix. >>> > >>> > >>> > Ian >>> > >>> > >>> > At 11:35 PM 2/28/2008 +0300, Pavel Kuzin wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi! >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Thanks for your reply. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I have just simple MPLS and BGP config too. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> #sh run | in mpls >>> >> mpls ldp loop-detection mpls label protocol ldp mpls mtu 1540 mpls ip >>> >> mpls >>> >> mtu 1540 mpls ip mpls mtu 1540 mpls ip mpls ldp router-id Loopback0 force >>> >> >>> >> #sh mpls interfaces >>> >> Interface IP Tunnel BGP Static Operational >>> >> Vlan100 Yes (ldp) No No No Yes >>> >> Vlan410 Yes (ldp) No No No Yes >>> >> Vlan301 Yes (ldp) No No No Yes >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> hi pavel, >>> >>> >>> >>> i must admit, i'm not an mpls guru, but im working on it ;) whilst i >>> >>> can't offer you any direct solution, i can say i'm a bit fascinated >>> >>> by this because i have for example a sup720 3bxl taking 3 x full views >>> >>> 243k >>> >>> routes per peer, have mpls tag switching enabled on 5 SVI's and i dont >>> >>> see the behaviour you see. >>> >>> >>> >>> router#sh mpls int | i Vl Vlan2 Yes (ldp) No Yes >>> >>> Vlan3 Yes (ldp) No Yes >>> >>> Vlan4 Yes (ldp) No Yes >>> >>> Vlan12 Yes (ldp) No Yes >>> >>> Vlan14 Yes (ldp) No Yes >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> router# sh ip bgp sum Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent >>> >>> TblVer >>> >>> InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> >>> State/PfxRcd >>> >>> 61.88.xxx.xx 4 7474 19165667 424902 69092680 0 0 21w2d >>> >>> 243009 >>> >>> 61.88.xxx.xx 4 7474 20943846 426386 69092680 0 0 5w2d >>> >>> 243007 >>> >>> 220.157.xx.x 4 9723 12753587 15032863 69092733 0 0 2w0d >>> >>> 243093 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> router#sh platform hardware cap | b L3 Forward L3 Forwarding >>> >>> Resources >>> >>> FIB TCAM usage: Total Used >>> >>> %Used >>> >>> 72 bits (IPv4, MPLS, EoM) 524288 246423 >>> >>> 47% >>> >>> 144 bits (IP mcast, IPv6) 262144 5 >>> >>> 1% >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> router#sh mpls ip bind sum Total number of prefixes: 1453 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Generic label bindings >>> >>> assigned learned prefixes in labels out labels 1453 >>> >>> 1446 13042 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> my mpls config is pretty straight forward >>> >>> >>> >>> mpls label range 16 256000 mpls label protocol ldp no tag-switching >>> >>> ip propagate-ttl tag-switching tdp router-id Loopback0 force >>> >>> >>> >>> ... very curious !! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> hardware is sup720 pfc3bxl with ios 12.2(18)SXF8 >>> >>> >>> >>> kind regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> --matt >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> > >>> > >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
