Hi Justin, WRT MLPPP, the PA-MC-2T3-EC's can offload MLPPP to the card, rather than the CPU. Depending on which NPE is installed, that can make quite a difference. And yes, the 7200's support multi-chassis MLPPP, with the proper IOS image.
-- Stephen Justin Shore wrote: > I want to sanity check something before I give someone a quote. I'm > trying to figure out what the differences are between the PA-MC-2T3+ and > the PA-MC-2T3-EC. The desired application is to provide QoS-enabled T1s > grouped together on channelized DS3s. Both PAs appears to be > channelized. They appear to be the same. The chassis I intend to put > them in is a 7206VXR with the G2. > > They want to provide QoS on these T1s. Are there any QoS gotchas with > these PAs in the 7200s? > > The last question that comes to mind is MLPPP. Can you combine T1s from > different DS3 interfaces and on different PAs into a single bundle? > This would provide circuit redundancy (to a degree) and PA redundancy. > Ideally we'd do multichassis MLPPP but I don't think the 7200s support that. > > The other solution that I'm supposed to spec out is doing DS3s for T1 > termination on 6500/7600s. The way I see it we could either go the > route of FlexWAN modules or DS3 SPAs. Both would be terribly expensive > I'm afraid. DS3 will be the hand-off from the local loops but I > supposed we could aggregate that into OCx if it makes financial sense. > I'm open to suggestions. > > > Thanks > Justin > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
