'Exec-on' commands are sent via IPC over the switch fabric and
'attach' sessions go over the mbus.
Eninja
On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Aaron <[email protected]> wrote:
So, what is the difference in output from doing exec-on vs attach?
You are still connecting via the same method.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 14:07, e ninja <[email protected]> wrote:
Antonio,
You should *never* troubleshoot fabric errors with *any* exec-on
commands.
They run over the fabric that may or may not be compromised.
1. Are any other LCs apart from slot 6 reporting CRC errors?
2. grab two "sh contr fia" from the RP and an attach to all the
LCs and
send over.
Eninja
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Antonio Soares
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> I have a 12k reporting this:
>
> %FABRIC-3-ERR_HANDLE: Reconfigure LC on fabric due to CRC error
from slot 6
>
> In one week, i have 4 of these messages.
>
> Slot 6 is a SIP-601 containing 2 x SPA-10G.
>
> What could be the problem ?
>
> The "show controllers fia" do not show any problem.
>
> The "execute-on slot 6 show controllers fia" show this:
>
> Switch cards present: 0x1F
> Switch cards monitored: 0x1F
> 0 1 2 3 4
> -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
> los 0 0 0 0 0
> state Off Off Off Off Off
> crc16 53989 0 0 0 0
> xor error0 0 0 0
> cell drops1020 1020 1020 1020
>
>
> IOS=c12kprp-p-mz.120-32.SY6.bin
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S)
> [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
