Hi, On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:23:26PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: > As did SVI support for BFD on the 6500 on later code, but > let me not wake Gert and others :-).
Ho humm, I was visiting Cisco Munich today, but I didn't even get to *that*
point. When I started ranting to the AM present about the 20 different
operating systems on Cisco devices today, and the 6500/7600 BU mess, he
was already entering brainwash mode ("you have to understand how a big
company works! there are good reasons to this! this is the best path
for Cisco and our customers!").
I have no idea how to get that point (BFD is good! make it happen! on SVI!)
across to the relevant people... *sigh*
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpxf1VqKnkSw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
