On 2/22/10 2:14 PM, Tom Lanyon wrote: > On 23/02/2010, at 7:41 AM, Jeff Kell wrote: > >> On 2/22/2010 3:45 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: >>> Exactly. Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know the only way to >>> get that functionality back is a 6500, and that's a *huge* step. >>> >> >> Umm, 4500 Sup-IV appears to support input/output (or at least doesn't >> bitch at the configs in a quick test...). > > > Does that mean a 4948/4900M could possibly support it too? >
I believe the 4900M is a Sup6 equivalent. I know it supports IPv6 in hardware whereas the 4948 does not. ~Seth _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
