Hi, On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:42:17AM +0100, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:41:18 +0100, you wrote: > > > I have no idea how to get that point (BFD is good! make it happen! > > on SVI!) across to the relevant people... *sigh* > > The SP people do get it, and I'm sure it's now (again) roadmapped for > the 7600, where it's relevant. Whether it'll ever show up on a campus > switch (6500) may be another story.
Now that you mention it. I did not rant over the BU split for at least
two months, did I?
The decision for which (mid-to-high end platforms) a certain feature is
"relevant" is something I find highly interesting. As if enterprise
customers don't want high availability.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpaGp7pReygK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
