I did some NETEM on Linux testing couple of years ago. Seems to be a good tool if you do not need superb accuracy in impairment generation - I remember at least the delay generation being accurate in the +-2ms ballpark.
If you you need dead on accurate impairment generation, I suggest looking into Anue boxes. http://www.anuesystems.com/Products_NetworkEmulator_landing.shtml. -Juuso On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Jake Khuon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 11:40 -0500, [email protected] wrote: > > If you are looking for a commercially supported solution, there is a box > > called a "network nightmare" that can simulate most of that stuff. > > http://networknightmare.net/ > > (My understanding is that its just an embedded Linux box) > > I've used Network Nightmare. It works pretty well. It really doesn't > do anything you couldn't craft up yourself from one of the free > opensource solutions already mentioned but if you don't want to be > bothered rolling your own appliance and just want something prepackaged > and commercial it'll do the job. I did think the pricing was a bit > steep however. > > > -- > /*=================[ Jake Khuon <[email protected]> ]=================+ > | Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | -------- | > | for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS | > +==================================================================*/ > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
