Hi, On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:16:30PM +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote: > But we're also getting tired of people not able to > interpret traceroutes, so we've thought about disabling it anyway.
Part of our next bid for upstream connectivity will be "working traceroute".
We're getting tired of people blaiming our upstream link for transatlantic
delays (hidden by traceroute hiding in upstream network), packet loss in
upstream network, problems with the next-hop ISP border routers, etc.
Yes, we have our share of "customer not able to read traceroute", but
the pain of "being a customer, and not being able to *do* traceroute"
is much worse.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpWTH7Y8phQf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
