Hi, On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:25:46PM +0200, Christian Kratzer wrote: > I will definetely want to do more research on this and open a case with our > cisco contacts. We do not have redundant IOS processes as I was able to > verify now and the box has 4 GB of ram so I would expect to see 2 GB for > IOS on accounts of above posting but we are only seeing 1 GB usable ram.
The wonders of modern software architecture.
Could someone explain to me again what's so great about IOS XE, and why
IOS XR or NX-OS or anything else halfway decent is not used on these
platforms, except "because another business unit made it"?
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpSNzo8YjWVz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
