On 7/20/12 1:08 PM, Gert Doering wrote:

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 02:58:58PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
        I think my point is..  If you are buying an asr9k
you can likely afford an ethernet switch vs using an
expensive router port.
Sometimes BVI are the poor man's multi-chassis etherchannel to
get redundant links to downstream switches...

On ASR9k you can configure MC-LAG, which is present for that kind of
scenarios, and you don't need to use BVI to build some tricky
workarounds.

--
"There's no sense in being precise when |               Łukasz Bromirski
 you don't know what you're talking     |      jid:[email protected]
 about."               John von Neumann |    http://lukasz.bromirski.net
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to