On (2012-11-14 15:25 +0100), Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > Is anyone using label-allocation-mode per-ce instead of the default > label-allocation-mode per-prefix in production mpls backbone please?
Sorry I read this too fast. I presumed 'per-ce' or 'per-vrf'. If your options are 'per-ce' and 'per-prefix' I don't understand difference. Since to me they mean the same thing, you have unique label when ever you have unique need for L2 rewrite Having different label for two prefixes going to same L2 rewrite makes no sense to me and there is no point at all to use one. You're just wasting labels without any benefits. My previous email was about 'per-ce' and 'per-vrf' merits. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
