So basically, Per-prefix = per "destination prefix" Per-ce = per next hop
The only scenario I can imagine that would benefit form the default behavior of per-prefix label allocation is PE connects to multiple CEs via one link to a L2 switch and the CEs run IGP with the PE adam -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Vitkovsky Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 5:36 PM To: 'Saku Ytti'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] label-allocation-mode per-ce Operational experience >If your options are 'per-ce' and 'per-prefix' I don't understand >difference How I understood it is as follows: per-prefix = if my ebgp peer in vrf sent me 3 prefixes each will get a unique label -which sounds pointless per-ce = if my ebgp peer in vrf sent me 3 prefixes each will get the same label per-vrf = I will allocate single label to represent all prefixes received from all ebgp neighbours -thus requirement for additional lookup adam _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
