On (2012-11-14 17:56 +0100), Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > So basically, > Per-prefix = per "destination prefix" > Per-ce = per next hop
Yes. > The only scenario I can imagine that would benefit form the default behavior > of per-prefix label allocation is > > PE connects to multiple CEs via one link to a L2 switch and the CEs run IGP > with the PE Yeah. If you are now sharing next-hop, then one of them converges to another local interface. In per-prefix it's local repair, per-ce it's globally visible repair. But that is really coined example, not very practical. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
