On (2012-11-14 17:36 +0100), Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > How I understood it is as follows: > per-prefix = if my ebgp peer in vrf sent me 3 prefixes each will get a > unique label -which sounds pointless > per-ce = if my ebgp peer in vrf sent me 3 prefixes each will get the same > label > per-vrf = I will allocate single label to represent all prefixes received > from all ebgp neighbours -thus requirement for additional lookup
Yeah you got it right. And I couldn't agree more, per-prefix indeed really makes no sense in any at least semi realistic scenario. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
