Both Sup2t and RSP720 (to a lesser extent but still much better than Sup720) can handle the churn of full feeds.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Tony Varriale <[email protected]>wrote: > On 2/19/2013 2:57 PM, Jon Lewis wrote: > >> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Eric A Louie wrote: >> >> I've run out of port capacity on my 7206VXR and need to go to "the next >>> router" >>> or put in another 7206VXR side-by-side. >>> >>> Any recommendations on what to use if I were to replace my existing >>> 7206VXR with >>> another chassis? (it's limited to 5 GB interfaces, and we need 7 or 8) >>> >> >> You've got to say more about what the router is doing and what you need >> from it. If it's routing for 8 1gb ethernets and doing full BGP routes, >> and nothing special, then a 6500 is an attractive option bang for your >> buck-wise. They're made for ethernet and comparitively cheap to keep >> adding ports to. >> >> Except when said 6500 sup CPU is asked to do BGP intensive stuff :) > > tv > > > ______________________________**_________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> > archive at > http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/> > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
