Hi, Thanks, I was under the impression that native vlan is global. Great stuff then, this setup also works on cisco :).
Regards On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:32:53PM +0300, Damian Higgins wrote: > > How about this scenario. Let's say you want a VLAN tagged on all the > ports, > > but also want different untagged VLANs on those ports (e.g. port 10 > tagged > > vlan 306 and untagged vlan 6, port 11 tagged vlan 306 and untagged vlan > 7). > > So native VLAN is out of question here since all ports would be untagged > in > > the same VLAN ID. > > No. Native VLAN is per-port, and would do exactly this: specify the VLAN > that is assigned to untagged incoming frames, and that is sent untagged > for outgoing frames. > > > Can you please test the following setup and tell me if it works? : > > > > interface GigabitEthernet0/10 > > description testing cisco vlans > > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > > switchport trunk allowed vlan 306 > > switchport mode trunk > > switchport access vlan 6 > > "switchport access" is irrelevant for trunk mode, *plus* if you only > allow "vlan 306", vlan 6 will not be sent, no matter whether tagged or not. > > gert > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > // > www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany > [email protected] > fax: +49-89-35655025 > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
