Hi, On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:32:53PM +0300, Damian Higgins wrote: > How about this scenario. Let's say you want a VLAN tagged on all the ports, > but also want different untagged VLANs on those ports (e.g. port 10 tagged > vlan 306 and untagged vlan 6, port 11 tagged vlan 306 and untagged vlan 7). > So native VLAN is out of question here since all ports would be untagged in > the same VLAN ID.
No. Native VLAN is per-port, and would do exactly this: specify the VLAN
that is assigned to untagged incoming frames, and that is sent untagged
for outgoing frames.
> Can you please test the following setup and tell me if it works? :
>
> interface GigabitEthernet0/10
> description testing cisco vlans
> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> switchport trunk allowed vlan 306
> switchport mode trunk
> switchport access vlan 6
"switchport access" is irrelevant for trunk mode, *plus* if you only
allow "vlan 306", vlan 6 will not be sent, no matter whether tagged or not.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpHeODoIhF5_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
