On 4/9/13, Damian Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > How about this scenario. Let's say you want a VLAN tagged on all the ports, > but also want different untagged VLANs on those ports (e.g. port 10 tagged > vlan 306 and untagged vlan 6, port 11 tagged vlan 306 and untagged vlan 7).
int g0/10 switchport trunk allowed vlan 6,306 switchport trunk native vlan 6 int g0/11 switchport trunk allowed vlan 7,306 switchport trunk native vlan 7 > So native VLAN is out of question here since all ports would be untagged in > the same VLAN ID. native vlan is per port > > > Can you please test the following setup and tell me if it works? : shouldn't work - 'switchport access vlan nnn' is for non-trunking ports. Regards, Lee > > interface GigabitEthernet0/10 > description testing cisco vlans > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > switchport trunk allowed vlan 306 > switchport mode trunk > switchport access vlan 6 > > > interface GigabitEthernet0/11 > description testing cisco vlans > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > switchport trunk allowed vlan 306 > switchport mode trunk > switchport access vlan 7 > > > I don't have any cisco switches at the moment that I could do this test on, > but I can tell you for sure that this setup is possibile on other switches > (HP procurve for example, and they're way cheaper :) > > Regards, > > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 04/08/2013 09:48 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> I would like to be able to accept both tagged and untagged >>> frames >>>> on my >>>> 3560g. For the untagged frames, I'd like to be able to say these are a >>>> member of some vlan - say 100 - otherwise I want to be able to allow >>>> tagged frames from some list. >>>> >>>> In testing, it doesn't appear that "switchport trunk native >>>> vlan >>>> xxxx" >>>> is doing the job; anything I send untagged is dropped and doesn't show >>>> up in the switch mac address tables. Here is my config: >>>> >>>> >>> Similar configs work for us. >>> >>> >>> >>>> interface GigabitEthernet0/45 >>>> description testing cisco vlans >>>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q >>>> switchport trunk native vlan 6 >>>> switchport trunk allowed vlan 306 >>>> switchport mode trunk >>>> >>>> >>>> It it helps. I do also have dot1q native vlan tagging enabled. >>>> >>>> >>> I believe you need to drop that - it tells the switch that the native >>> VLAN should be tagged. >>> >>> Also, add the native VLAN to the list of allowed VLANs (so you'd get >>> "switchport trunk allowed vlan 6,306" here). >>> >>> >> >> >> I removed dot1q tag native and that seems to have worked. Unfortunately, >> it caused other problems requiring me to set the native vlans on some >> ports >> to something other than default. In the end it's working but I just don't >> see why I can't say 'hey, got an untagged frame? throw it into this vlan >> for me...'. Maybe I need more expensive switches. >> >> Thanks all. >> >> Mike- >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> >> archive at >> http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/> >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
