Hello Aaron, Thanks for sharing info. Regarding to send-lable command, Cisco call it a magic command, to make PE router to advertise IPv6 prefix as a label. I am working on 6PE deployment. - PEs & IGW ----- MPBGP ----- RR - add adress-family ipv6 at PEs & RR ( active & send-label ) It will work
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Aaron <[email protected]> wrote: > (I'm looking at my ios xr asr9k doing this and sending notes about how I > did > it, I didn't do the rr yet, but I understand this is how it's done on rr > too) > > IGW.... > > - Vrf defined...enable ipv6 address family on this vrf... > - Add internet interface to this vrf... > - add ipv6 address to this internet interface > - under bgp, under vrf, enable the appropriate ipv6 native type stuff for > bgp neighboring, etc (JUST LIKE V4)...but I have no idea why you need > send-label. > - enable mpls on connection towards your internal mpls cloud (toward your > rr) ...for 6vpe only v4 is needed on your internal net > - on the internal side, enable mpibgp with address-family vpnv6 unicast > from > the igw to the rr on both sides and of course from rr to other internal > pe's > > RR.... > - I think the vpvn6 af for that mpibgp session towards igw and other > internal pe's is all that is required on rr in order to support 6vpe > > other internal pe's... > > - Vrf defined...enable ipv6 address family on this vrf... > - Add customer facing interface to this vrf... > - add ipv6 address to this customer facing interface > - under bgp, under vrf, enable the appropriate ipv6 native type stuff for > customer facing pe-ce routing...but I have no idea why you need send-label. > - enable mpls on connection towards your internal mpls cloud (toward your > rr) ...for 6vpe only v4 is needed on your internal net > - on the internal side, enable mpibgp with address-family vpnv6 unicast > from > the igw to the rr on both sides and of course from rr to other internal > pe's > > > Aaron > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Ahmed Hilmy > Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 5:00 AM > To: Mikael Abrahamsson > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE > > But i dont have MP-BGP between IGW & RR, I have pure BGP IPv4. > So ? > > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: > > > > Can i add address family IPv6 at IGW to advertise IPv6 routes to RR, > >> since it is directly connected ? > >> > > > > Sure. I would configure send-label there as well so that you do thing > > in a consistent manner, but that's a matter of opinion. > > > > > > -- > > Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
