Hello Mikael, it is clear to add send-label at PEs & RR. Now i am thinking about IGW, if we consider it as a PE so we have to enable MP-BGP. RR is directly connected to IGW, i am thinking to establish a new link for native IPv6 ? So at RR has two links connected to IGW, one of them is address family ipv4 and other IPv6 address ? What do u think ?
Regards, Ahmed On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Ahmed Hilmy <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Mikeal. > > address-family ipv6 unicast but you add "send-label". at PEs & RR ? > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: >> >> We can say MP-BGP ( vpnv4 ) will carry IPv6 packets as a label across >>> IPv4 >>> MPLS Backone. >>> Thanks in advance for sharing info. >>> >> >> vpnv6 is what you need for 6VPE (IPv6 VRFs). >> >> 6PE is for "Internet IPv6", and there you do it under address-family ipv6 >> unicast but you add "send-label". >> >> >> -- >> Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] >> > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
