When you changed the settings, you rebooted the all box, right ? Check this:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11333356/cisco-7609-rsp720-3cxl-g e-mls-cef-maximum-routes Regards, Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP) [email protected] http://www.ccie18473.net -----Original Message----- From: Rod James Bio [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: quinta-feira, 7 de Agosto de 2014 03:18 To: Mack McBride; Antonio Soares; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Adjusting TCAM allocation weird behavior on 7600 On my OP, I mentioned that I have two supervising engine on SSO mode which is: 1 5 Route Switch Processor 720 10GE (Activ RSP720-3CXL-10GE 2 5 Route Switch Processor 720 10GE (Hot) RSP720-3CXL-10GE Though, the second one was added much later. I was running c7600rsp72043-adventerprisek9-mz.153-1.S1.bin before but now I updated it to c7600rsp72043-adventerprisek9-mz.153-3.S3.bin. Running "sh mls cef max", I see: #sh mls cef maximum-routes FIB TCAM maximum routes : ======================= Current :- ------- IPv4 + MPLS - 512k (default) IPv6 + IP Multicast - 256k (default) User configured :- --------------- IPv4 - 768k MPLS - 24k IPv6 + IP Multicast - 112k (default) Upon reboot :- ----------- IPv4 - 768k MPLS - 24k IPv6 + IP Multicast - 112k (default) BUT "remote command switch show mls cef max", I see: FIB TCAM maximum routes : ======================= Current :- ------- IPv4 + MPLS - 512k (default) IPv6 + IP Multicast - 256k (default) Could this mean that the two sups are not sync? Here is the output of show redundancy states: #sh redundancy states my state = 13 -ACTIVE peer state = 8 -STANDBY HOT Mode = Duplex Unit = Primary Unit ID = 1 Redundancy Mode (Operational) = sso Redundancy Mode (Configured) = sso Redundancy State = sso Maintenance Mode = Disabled Communications = Up client count = 169 client_notification_TMR = 30000 milliseconds keep_alive TMR = 9000 milliseconds keep_alive count = 1 keep_alive threshold = 18 RF debug mask = 0x0 Regards, On 8/6/14, 23:51, Mack McBride wrote: > This is a silly question but do you have dual sups? > That could be causing the issue. > > Also what code revision are you running? > Finally, what line cards are installed? > The message you are getting indicates the config is not working For > whatever reason, one of the reasons could be line card incompatibility. > > A show module should list the line cards. > > Also once you configure the routes on the supervisor and save the > config Execute the following command: > > remote command switch show mls cef max > > That will determine if the max routes command is getting properly > Pushed to the switch processor. > > And a side note multicast and ipv6 both use two entries. > The other poster that said you were 28 short was incorrect. > Those settings should have worked. > > Mack McBride | Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc. > O: 720.891.2502 | [email protected] | www.viawest.com | > LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Rod James Bio > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 1:38 PM > To: Antonio Soares; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Adjusting TCAM allocation weird behavior on 7600 > > Hmm I somewhat tried that with these, > > sh mls cef maximum-routes > FIB TCAM maximum routes : > ======================= > Current :- > ------- > IPv4 + MPLS - 512k (default) > IPv6 + IP Multicast - 256k (default) > > User configured :- > --------------- > IPv4 - 768k > MPLS - 16k > IPv6 + IP Multicast - 120k (default) > > Upon reboot :- > ----------- > IPv4 - 768k > MPLS - 16k > IPv6 + IP Multicast - 120k (default) > > but still no dice. IOS bug? > > Regards, > > On 8/6/14, 3:27, Antonio Soares wrote: >> Maybe IPv6 and IP Multicast must share the same region of the TCAM. >> >> Just try to remove all the "mls cef maximum-routes" commands then >> just add this one: >> >> mls cef maximum-routes ip 768 >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP) >> [email protected] >> http://www.ccie18473.net >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rod James Bio [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: terça-feira, 5 de Agosto de 2014 19:41 >> To: Antonio Soares; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Adjusting TCAM allocation weird behavior on 7600 >> >> This is what I tried, >> >> #sh mls cef maximum-routes >> FIB TCAM maximum routes : >> ======================= >> Current :- >> ------- >> IPv4 + MPLS - 512k (default) >> IPv6 + IP Multicast - 256k (default) >> >> User configured :- >> --------------- >> IPv4 + MPLS - 768k (default) >> IPv6 - 100k >> IP Multicast - 28k >> >> After a wr mem and reboot this is what I got: >> *Aug 6 02:15:46.975 PHT: %MLSCEF-SP-1-MAX_ROUTE_MISMATCH: Maximum >> routes config mismatch. Reconfigure the maximum routes values and reload the box. >> >> As you will see the max routes adds to 1024k but still It resets to >> the default values. >> >> Regards, >> >> On 8/6/14, 1:28, Antonio Soares wrote: >>> As already mentioned, the sum should be 1024k, for example, I have >>> this on a >>> SUP720-3BXL: >>> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> sup720-3bxl#show mls cef maximum-routes FIB TCAM maximum routes : >>> ======================= >>> Current :- >>> ------- >>> IPv4 - 1007k >>> MPLS - 1k (default) >>> IPv6 + IP Multicast - 8k (default) >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> >>> >>> 1007+1+(2x8) = 1024 >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP) >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.ccie18473.net >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >>> Of >> Rod >>> James Bio >>> Sent: terça-feira, 5 de Agosto de 2014 16:13 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Adjusting TCAM allocation weird behavior on >>> 7600 >>> >>> I read before the link you sent. >>> >>> BTW, Here is the output of "sh mls cef max": >>> >>> #sh mls cef maximum-routes >>> FIB TCAM maximum routes : >>> ======================= >>> Current :- >>> ------- >>> IPv4 + MPLS - 512k (default) >>> IPv6 + IP Multicast - 256k (default) >>> >>> User configured :- >>> --------------- >>> IPv4 - 600k >>> MPLS - 10k >>> IPv6 - 100k >>> IP Multicast - 28k >>> >>> Upon reboot :- >>> IPv4 - 600k >>> MPLS - 10k >>> IPv6 - 100k >>> IP Multicast - 28k >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> On 8/5/14, 22:15, Antonio Soares wrote: >>>> Check this document, maybe it can help you: >>>> >>>> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-se >>>> r ie s-swit ches/117712-problemsolution-cat6500-00.html >>>> >>>> Can you share the "show mls cef max" output ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP) [email protected] >>>> http://www.ccie18473.net >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On >>>> Behalf Of Rod James Bio >>>> Sent: terça-feira, 5 de Agosto de 2014 12:03 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [c-nsp] Adjusting TCAM allocation weird behavior on 7600 >>>> >>>> Hi, I'd like to ask anyone in the group who owns cisco 7600 if they >>>> had experience when they adjusted the allocation to increase the >>>> maximum routes for ipv4 etc. We are near the 512K ipv4 limit >>>> (~509K) for the >>>> 7600 (default size) and I tried adjusting the tcam allocation by running: >>>> >>>> mls cef maximum-routes ip 750 >>>> mls cef maximum-routes ipv6 100 >>>> mls cef maximum-routes mpls 10 >>>> mls cef maximum-routes ip-multicast 28 >>>> >>>> But after rebooting the whole box I got an error, "Maximum routes >>>> config mismatch. reconfigure the maximum routes values and reload >>>> the box" (Sorry this is all I copied from the console) and the tcam >>>> was back to the default values. >>>> >>>> I have a dual RSP720-3CXL-10GE sups on sso mode and >>>> c7600rsp72043-adventerprisek9-mz.153-1.S1.bin if those info help. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
