Thank you for the suggestion - I've been using these in the lab quite a bit lately as I've lost faith in GNS3 (watching it fall apart when showing clients proof of concept - "this won't happen on the real kit..") , however I am a little scared to run the internet vlan(s) into the esx estate at this time, there is a rather old fashioned security policy in place. Perhaps if we had dedicated hosts
I think we can pick up 2 of the new little 3560's-CX's for £~5k each with ip services & netflow - just hoping 11k prefixes is enough. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 03 June 2015 10:27 To: Nick Cutting; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431 On 3/Jun/15 09:11, Nick Cutting wrote: > We are looking at replacing some routers for a client, as they have recently > upgraded to 1Gb internet. > > They just take a default route in from 2 carriers, but may be looking at > taking in a few more routes - probably just those of each provider, so > certainly much less than the 20k limits we see on many platforms. > > Price is a big concern - and this will be purely routing traffic and speaking > BGP. > > I was looking at the ISR4431 with a 1gb licence and the ASR920 - the ASR1k is > just too expensive. > We use 4551's in other locations and they are very decent router - although > they are 2U. 1U is a requirement. > > Would I just need the 6 port gigabit licence - and the chassis for the 920? > > Or do I need something to unlock a base set of features cable of speaking BGP > Ipv4 ? > > The ISR4431 looks to be 3x as expensive - if I just need the licencing > mentioned above for the 920. CSR1000v? Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
