Hello Waris. Yepp we looked at it but we can not provide access to some of our hardware to this and then the point is more or less gone as we see it. Might be that our implementation is a corner case but that's the problem for us.
//Gustav From: Waris Sagheer (waris) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: den 4 juni 2015 04:58 To: Gustav Ulander; Gert Doering; Nick Cutting Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431 Gustav, Have you looked at smart licensing? I am hoping that should simplify the process. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Routing Segment [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to:http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Gustav Ulander <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 5:18 AM To: Gert Doering <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Nick Cutting <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431 Hello all. My take is that a consumption based sales model can be good as long as you are not hindered in your work because of it. Hate when you have some late night work to be done that can't be completed because of some weird restriction dependent in some way on a license. RTU licenses are the way from my way of looking at it however, I have a feeling that cisco is not equally impressed with RTU licenses. //Gustav -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: den 3 juni 2015 13:55 To: Nick Cutting Cc: Gert Doering; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431 Hi, On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:41:41AM +0000, Nick Cutting wrote: Yep, I don't mind at all. :) Too many times it has been, "should've gone cisco" in terms of missing features stability etc. At least with cisco I know what works and doesn't. I used to say that, 15 years ago... Then they decided to split the company into in-fighting BUs... Nowadays, I know that "it works" if I've laid my hands on it and it actually did (and didn't lose the license to make it work on the next upgrade). gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
