Hello all. My take is that a consumption based sales model can be good as long as you are not hindered in your work because of it. Hate when you have some late night work to be done that can't be completed because of some weird restriction dependent in some way on a license. RTU licenses are the way from my way of looking at it however, I have a feeling that cisco is not equally impressed with RTU licenses.
//Gustav -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: den 3 juni 2015 13:55 To: Nick Cutting Cc: Gert Doering; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431 Hi, On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:41:41AM +0000, Nick Cutting wrote: > Yep, I don't mind at all. :) > > Too many times it has been, "should've gone cisco" in terms of missing > features stability etc. > > At least with cisco I know what works and doesn't. I used to say that, 15 years ago... Then they decided to split the company into in-fighting BUs... Nowadays, I know that "it works" if I've laid my hands on it and it actually did (and didn't lose the license to make it work on the next upgrade). gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected] fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
