Yep, I don't mind at all. :) Too many times it has been, "should've gone cisco" in terms of missing features stability etc.
At least with cisco I know what works and doesn't. -----Original Message----- From: Gert Doering [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 03 June 2015 12:30 To: Nick Cutting Cc: Reuben Farrelly; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431 Hi, On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:25:45AM +0000, Nick Cutting wrote: > I really like the 4451's - they much more like an ASR than an ISR - they do > "most" things in hardware. > We have had to buy a lot of licences though - but this just the way that > cisco is going. Well, if you give them money for it, you support their direction. Give your money to other vendors (or BUs, for that matter *sigh*) that are not as annoying... gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected] fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
