On 8 December 2015 at 06:00, Wes Smith <[email protected]> wrote: Hey,
> Hmm > I grabbed that config from a working asr1002x on 3.16. > I've been using that for a while with dynamic neighbors in a vrf. > > range config is in the root bgp config and the peer-group is defined in the > address family for the vrf. I'm not sure if it's actually supported, might work by accident. If the feature would be designed to work with VRF, surely range definition would be inside VRF? Otherwise you cannot have same networks in different VRF's. Granted this wouldn't be first time CSCO introduced VRF configuration which excluded non-unique addresses, original VRF-select was main-level config, mapping IP address to an VRF. It's such a shame all vendors treat VRF as a 2nd class citizen, I'm convinced it also leads to higher code complexity keeping VRF and global different, compared too approach where INET is just another VRF. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
