BugID?

> On Apr 25, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Chris Welti <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> since a few of you seem to have ASR 920 deployed, a word of warning about 
> upgrading to 03.18.00.S/15.6(2)S:
> 
> - upgrading from a previous image might lead to some or all of your four 10GE 
> uplink ports being put in admin shut down state which is reflected in 
> running-config as well as startup-config after the upgrade.
> This could lead to unreachability if you use those as backbone links and 
> don't have an OOB console. Even a physical power off/power on won't help, as 
> it's written to NVRAM.
> You will need to re-activate the ports on the CLI with no shut. Subsequent 
> reloads don't seem to be affected, so it's just the upgrade that's flawed. 
> (Might have to do with the removed "license feature port bulk" command).
> 
> - removing a transceiver from one of the four 10GE uplink ports will put the 
> interface in admin shut down:
> 
> Router#
> *Apr 25 06:03:45.805: %TRANSCEIVER-6-REMOVED: SIP0: iomd:  Transceiver module 
> removed from TenGigabitEthernet0/0/24
> *Apr 25 06:03:47.806: %TRANSCEIVER-6-REMOVED: SIP0: iomd:  Transceiver module 
> removed from TenGigabitEthernet0/0/26
> *Apr 25 06:03:47.814: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/0/24, 
> changed state to administratively down
> *Apr 25 06:03:49.812: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/0/26, 
> changed state to administratively down
> *Apr 25 06:03:50.804: %TRANSCEIVER-6-REMOVED: SIP0: iomd:  Transceiver module 
> removed from TenGigabitEthernet0/0/25
> *Apr 25 06:03:51.808: %TRANSCEIVER-6-REMOVED: SIP0: iomd:  Transceiver module 
> removed from TenGigabitEthernet0/0/27
> *Apr 25 06:03:52.807: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/0/25, 
> changed state to administratively down
> *Apr 25 06:03:54.320: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/0/27, 
> changed state to administratively down
> *Apr 25 06:03:54.803: %TRANSCEIVER-6-INSERTED: SIP0: iomd:  transceiver 
> module inserted in TenGigabitEthernet0/0/25
> *Apr 25 06:03:56.311: %TRANSCEIVER-6-INSERTED: SIP0: iomd:  transceiver 
> module inserted in TenGigabitEthernet0/0/24
> *Apr 25 06:03:56.322: %TRANSCEIVER-6-INSERTED: SIP0: iomd:  transceiver 
> module inserted in TenGigabitEthernet0/0/27
> *Apr 25 06:04:04.044: %TRANSCEIVER-6-INSERTED: SIP0: iomd:  transceiver 
> module inserted in TenGigabitEthernet0/0/26
> 
> So just replacing an SFP+ will need a CLI intervention (no shut) to get it 
> online again.
> This change is just affecting the running-config, a reboot will bring back 
> the old state (no shut).
> 
> This behaviour can be easily reproduced on a ASR-920-24SZ-M model, but might 
> also impact other models.
> 
> Regards,
> Chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to