On 27/04/16 18:52, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Quote:
"This is happening due to the Flexi license feature introduced to XE 3.18.
This is an expected behavior. Please refer to the document below for more
details on this.
Well that's clearly wrong, because Flex licensing was introduced in XE 3.13
(three, thirteen) and even the link they gave you has "xe-3-13s" in its url
(twice).
yes it was, but Flexi License support for ASR920 seems to have been only added
in XE3.18:
Flexi License
This feature enables the flexi license on Cisco ASR 920 Series Routers
beginning with Cisco IOS-XE Release 3.18S.
(see release notes for ASR920:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr920/release/notes/ASR920_rel_notes/new_features.html)
What this actually means is that with flexi license code you can now use *any
ports* on the router and not just the fixed ports that are assigned depending
on the licenses you have.
(Of course only up to the number of ports you have actually licensed)
Still, it doesn't have anything to do with the problem at hand.
(Apart from the fact that the implementation is obviously screwed)
Guess you are only at the beginning of the bullshit bingo dance.
I've found it particularly difficult to work with out-sourced TAC that not only
is completely incompetent, but also lacks knowledge of basic internal TAC
policies and tools. Seriously if you ask the same question at a McDrive, you
at least get a "i don't know", but they are paid to close a SR as fast as
possible
(or elaborate as many SRs as possible in the shortest amount of time possible).
If I think about the amount of money I'm shoving down their throats just for
support and what I get in return I could cry.
I totally agree, that is actually the saddest part.
--
Chris
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
