The spec sheet isn't really clear. On the 2T it is 1M which is quite constraining. If it is actually 2M then it would be fine as eventually IPv4 will die and IPv6 is going to have less prefixes.
Mack McBride | Senior Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc. O: 720.891.2502 | C: 303.720.2711 | [email protected] | www.viawest.com -----Original Message----- From: Peter Kranz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 2:27 PM To: Mack McBride; 'Gert Doering' Cc: 'cisco-nsp'; 'Jon Lewis' Subject: RE: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options.. Regarding TCAM ... Data sheets are a little confusing in this regard, some parts indicate "2M FIB TCAM Entries" some imply a 1M FIB limit. If it is a 2M FIB limit, It seems unlikely you would exhaust that limit in the next 10 years. Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207-0000 [email protected] This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected by law from disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Unless you are the addressee or authorized agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained within. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by electronic reply and immediately delete all copies of the message. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
