I wouldn't be considering it under normal circumstances. I have a customer that provides telephony services to a third party on prem with no PC connectivity to the customer's network.
On Aug 11, 2016 10:30 AM, "James Buchanan" <james.buchan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Ugly according to the one customer I tried it with. Their complain was > that there were too many pop-ups from it. For example, it was next to > impossible to make an outbound call without first going Not Ready. You > could exit all the pop-ups, but they'd come right back. Now, if that's what > you really want from Finesse, it's perfectly fine. All the Reason Codes and > Wrap Up codes work the way you'd expect. Like I said, it was just the > excess of pop-ups for that one customer. > > Also, I ended up having to associate the phones with the Application User > I created for FIPPA (and you must give it its own Application User). If you > don't, you end up with a weird error message at the end of every call. > > Thanks, > > James > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzv...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Has anyone used the Finesse IP Phone Agent yet? Good, bad, ugly? Does >> it look and feel similar to legacy IPPA? >> >> Thanks! >> >> -E >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-voip mailing list >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >> >> >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip