May as well just use IS-IS... Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -----Original Message----- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 8:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question in ABR [7:72624] At 5:17 PM +0000 7/19/03, Rajesh Kumar wrote: >Hello all, > >If a router has its interfaces in Area 1 and Area 2 and no Area 0, is it > >still considered to be an ABR OR strictly, one of the interfaces has to > >be in Area 0 to be an ABR? In the present implementation, at least one interface must be in area 0.0.0.0. There is a proposal in the OSPF Working Group to allow "inter-area ABRs," but I don't think this is yet commercially available -- it hasn't yet gotten to RFC. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72657&t=72624 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
