>I had read that it was best to use "no ip route-cache" on low speed
>interfaces? But I'm wondering why that would affect anything? I mean, if
>the caches work, then what's the problem with low speed interfaces? (as in
>this situation we're talking about here)....... strange........
>
>Mike W.
No ip route cache gives you more buffers by default than other modes.
Also, if you have more than one low-speed link to a destination, it
enables per-packet load balancing, which is more bandwidth-efficient.
Indeed, this is one of the few cases I recommend routinely tweaking
buffers. Decide what your largest window size will be, typically 64K
for TCP or NetBIOS. Divide that by the MTU and round up, so you are
sure to have enough buffers for a full window. Tends to smooth the
stream.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12412&t=12365
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
