Uh, really? You sure about that. >From my experience, when you're talking about IOS, you should never ever use the terms MPPP and stable in the same sentence.
I recommend CEF not because it's not flaky, because it is, but because it's a lot less flaky than Cisco's MPPP implementation. ""Brunner Joseph"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > its definately worth it.. combine multiple pipes at layer 2. I use MLPPP > with my ISP and it rocks.. forget all those shaky stupid CEF > and PER-PACKET configurations.. if you can get PPP going between your > carrier and you, you can get it all going to one router on their side, then > you should run MLPPP. > > It makes multiple physical pipes seem like one pipe to the IP process and if > one pipe flaps, the others get the load seemlessly.. used for along time now.. > > see > > this thread (and watch the wrap) > > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF8&th=bd690292e362dd5 7&seekm=3BC60D43.B4B83DAB%40webmaster.com&frame=off Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46949&t=46942 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
