Okay..... perhaps I don't monitor my bundles as close are y'all do, but we're running quite a few sites using multiple T1s bonded with MLPPP, and we don't have any stability problems (as far as dropping traffic and EIGRP neighbor changes, etc) that I'm aware of.... nrf, tell me more about what to look for or beware of when using MLPPP as far as flakines......
I haven't used any of the CEF configs, so I can't comment on that..... Mike W. "nrf" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Uh, really? You sure about that. > > From my experience, when you're talking about IOS, you should never ever use > the terms MPPP and stable in the same sentence. > > I recommend CEF not because it's not flaky, because it is, but because it's > a lot less flaky than Cisco's MPPP implementation. > > > ""Brunner Joseph"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > its definately worth it.. combine multiple pipes at layer 2. I use MLPPP > > with my ISP and it rocks.. forget all those shaky stupid CEF > > and PER-PACKET configurations.. if you can get PPP going between your > > carrier and you, you can get it all going to one router on their side, > then > > you should run MLPPP. > > > > It makes multiple physical pipes seem like one pipe to the IP process and > if > > one pipe flaps, the others get the load seemlessly.. used for along time > now.. > > > > see > > > > this thread (and watch the wrap) > > > > > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF8&th=bd690292e362dd5 > 7&seekm=3BC60D43.B4B83DAB%40webmaster.com&frame=off Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46954&t=46942 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
