I wouldn't use IOS MPPP either. Too many horror stories. I thought it
was dead until I saw it on the CID.
If other engineers are acutally using MPPP please do tell of your
experiences. I would like to hear more stories.
Theo
"nrf"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/19/2002 09:04 AM
Please respond to "nrf"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Combining T1's into one pipe [7:46942]
Uh, really? You sure about that.
>From my experience, when you're talking about IOS, you should never ever
use
the terms MPPP and stable in the same sentence.
I recommend CEF not because it's not flaky, because it is, but because
it's
a lot less flaky than Cisco's MPPP implementation.
""Brunner Joseph"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> its definately worth it.. combine multiple pipes at layer 2. I use MLPPP
> with my ISP and it rocks.. forget all those shaky stupid CEF
> and PER-PACKET configurations.. if you can get PPP going between your
> carrier and you, you can get it all going to one router on their side,
then
> you should run MLPPP.
>
> It makes multiple physical pipes seem like one pipe to the IP process
and
if
> one pipe flaps, the others get the load seemlessly.. used for along time
now..
>
> see
>
> this thread (and watch the wrap)
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF8&th=bd690292e362dd5
7&seekm=3BC60D43.B4B83DAB%40webmaster.com&frame=off
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46955&t=46942
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
