true- cef if the best for most situations, certainly at the 7500 and gsr levels where mlppp is a joke.. i m just saying for 2600 with 2 t's, also i have experienced lots of cef problems with NAT, which you would normally do on a little 2600. mlppp for me has not had these issues.. but i agree if you can use cef, the it is much better on bigger interfaces.
and the only time i would really avoid mlppp is with an isp that does not advertise the vanilla "NXDS1" solutions. (people like me who want 8 to 11 Mbps, but dont want to put all my eggs on a single DS-3 loop) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46966&t=46942 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
