[snip] >>work, but I may not be able to answer the question correctly on paper. And, >>in my opinion, it's more important to be able to "walk the walk" than "talk >>the talk". What do you think? > > > You make some excellent points. I think it's more than a binary "talk > the talk" vs. "walk the walk," the first being answering tests and > the second being demonstrating performance. > > It's long been a Cisco instructional principle that people learn in > different ways. Some are visual, some are conceptual, some are aural, > and some are tactile (i.e., hands on). I tend to be visual and > conceptual. > > You describe a very real-world requirement to "talk the walk" -- to > teach something, which is yet another skill set. Mind you, I find > that teaching or the equivalent writing is a good way to learn. >
the whole thing sounds nice, yes, but i guess it fixes something that needs to be cured. i sometimes get the opinion that everyone is doing certs to make hr jobs easier. it's not a hard job to sort the cv in two piles: certification and no certification. so know you add a third one? i doubt that it will give more credit to your cert, just another one. as long as people get jobs only on their certs and not on what they are and what they have done so far, nothing will change... oh, yes, someone is making more money... just my 2cents -bis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54542&t=54435 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
