No, this is no longer true since the decision in the DDAL case. (Doris
Day Animal League, et al, Plaintiffs vs. Ann Veneman, Secretary,
Department of Agriculture, et al, Defendants) Judge Kollar-Kotelly ruled
that the AWA was to be applied to ALL breeders, including hobby
breeders.  The AKC website has updates on this situation and its
appeal.  This is NOT a simple issue.  If the DDAL decision stands you
all will be subject to the 85 page document which can be found at
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ac/cfr/9cfr3/html
        Some of the changes you would have to make would include such things
as:

Dogs may not be allowed to live together in home environments for
protection against "transmission of disease" and breeders who keep dogs
in their home may be forced to consider kennels.
�       USDA inspectors will be free to visit homes at will and inspect while
possibly carrying diseases from commercial breeding establishments.
�       Specific identification of each animal by tag and tattoo/microchip is
required and record keeping is burdensome beyond what reputable hobby
breeders practice.
�       Dogs must be separately housed in a primary mathematically correct
enclosures.
�       Vaccination protocols are no longer at all discretionary but mandated.

Information on the Puppy Protection Act can be found at an excellent
website and source of legislation here:http://www.naiatrust.org/    The
people who run this site also wrote the book "The Hijacking of the
Humane Movement".

We do NOT need more legislation.  There is a huge difference between
animal welfare and animal "rightists" and this legislation is being
driven by animal rights factions.

Suze

Steve Wallis wrote:
>
> Dear Katy:
>
> Have you read the proposed bills in the house & senate?  I just did.  These
> bills are identical and would have the effect of changing some existing
> regulations that regulate the breeding of bitches by commercial breeders
> under the US Animal Welfare Act. Please note the AWA regulates breeders
> defined as dealers, and not so called "hobby breeders".  Also no changes
> are proposed to regulate "back-yard" breeders. The following summarises
> these bills as introduced:
>
--
Suze at Llawen Cavaliers
"...I have seen that in any great undertaking it is not enough for a man
to depend simply upon himself."  -Isna Ia-wica
"Thought comes before speech" Luther Standing Bear

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 1999 by its original author.

Reply via email to